Saturday, July 14, 2018

The Kent State Shootings: Kent's May 4 Visitors Center

THE KENT STATE SHOOTINGS:
KENT'S MAY 4 VISITORS CENTER 


I was in Kent two weeks ago and had lunch with my old friend Dean Kahler. Dean was able to get me into the May 4 Visitors Center before its official opening tomorrow. 

I did not have any issue with the Center itself. I was disappointed that the university did not even acknowledge any of the controversies that made May 4 such a cause celebre, and by the way it treated the judicial aftermath almost as if the search for the truth and the struggle for justice were of little consequence. 

My feeling was that the Center at least provided a decent overview for new students and people who were not alive in 1970. It was exactly what you expect to emanate from a committee comprised of people with different points of view. There was nothing in the Center to offend anyone, and by the same token, it did not excite me. Maybe I have been writing about May 4, 1970 for too long.

What astonished me, though, was the Center's 43-page handout pamphlet  (This We Know).  I was so angry that I have not been able to write about it for two weeks. The book was written by Carole Barbato, Laura Davis, and Mark Seeman, three of the professors who made the Center possible. In telling the story of May 1-4, 1970, the pamphlet cited every other major account of the tragedy except mine. They did not cite any of the new evidence I uncovered, any of my arguments, and the professors did not even include me in their "Recommended Reading."

This was no oversight. If anyone doubted my suspicions that Kent State scholars were trying to negate everything I did, this is the icing on the cake.

The irony, of course, is that I have been the only person who has examined all the new evidence. I have been galluping so far ahead of the Barbatos, Davises. Seemans, and Jerry Lewises that I do not think any scholar at Kent State will ever catch up with me.

I am sure the reason the do not want to encourage the reading of my book is because of my criticisms of Kent State schiolars, who, after 42 years, are still taking baby steps when it comes to May 4. I am sure my reporting on the dishonesty of Jerry Lewis' (their go-to expert) has not helped. And the radicals "positively hate" me, as one alumnus put it, because I argued the students who committed crimes on campus should have been prosecuted too. Laura Davis is one of the faculty members who supported the student violence, and if you are not an ideologue, you are not welcome at Kent State.

I do not think there will ever be really honest history emanating from Kent State. The university has hired crisis management experts to improve their reputation, and tightly control the local press. They want to make sure that anyone not promoting Kent State ever gets a chance to be heard.

Dean and I discussed this, and he made the remark that someone at the university is out to get me. I swear: it seems like every dunce at that university is in confederacy against me. Of course, that was Jonathan Swift's definition of a genius. I know that I am not a genius; just a B-plus student who is far more clever, resourceful, and much more of a real scholar than any of these people at Kent State.